Showing posts with label World Trade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World Trade. Show all posts

Sunday, December 26, 2010

China warns US bill on yuan could hurt trade ties

BEIJING - China on Thursday rejected US legislation seeking to punish Beijing for allegedly manipulating its currency, warning that pressure on the yuan issue could "severely damage" trade ties.

Beijing also said the bill -- overwhelmingly approved by the US House of Representatives on Wednesday -- violates World Trade Organization rules, and insisted it has not deliberately undervalued its currency.

Angry US lawmakers, who accuse Beijing of keeping the value of the yuan artificially low to give its exporters an unfair competitive edge, blamed the weak yuan for the loss of US jobs, just weeks ahead of key midterm elections.

"We firmly oppose the US Congress approving these bills," Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu told reporters.

"Exercising protectionism against China under the excuse of the renminbi exchange rate will only severely damage China-US trade and economic ties and have a negative impact on the two countries' economies and the world economy."

The legislation was passed even as the United States announced a resumption of military ties with China after a 10-month break, saying the two powers both wanted to avoid miscalculations in an increasingly tense region.

In Beijing, commerce ministry spokesman Yao Jian said the US bill was "inconsistent with relevant rules of the World Trade Organization to conduct an anti-subsidy investigation based on exchange rate reasons".

"China has never undervalued its currency in order to gain a competitive advantage. The US cannot use its trade deficit with China as an excuse to adopt trade protectionist measures," Yao said, state media reported.

The House bill calls on the US government to consider Beijing's currency policy as an improper trade subsidy, and expands the powers of the Commerce Department by allowing it to slap retaliatory tariffs on Chinese goods.

The chamber passed the bill by a 348-79 margin, one of its strongest showings against China in years, fuelled by voter anger at the struggling economy and joblessness near 10 percent ahead of November 2 elections.

Some critics say the yuan could be undervalued by as much as 40 percent.

"The US-China relationship is an important one in every way -- culturally, politically, diplomatically, economically, commercially -- but we need to have them play by the rules," said Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The US Senate has signaled it will take up a companion bill after the elections, but the legislation's fate is unclear and President Barack Obama has not formally taken a position on whether he supports it.

Ahead of the vote, Obama said at a campaign-style event in Iowa that the yuan was "undervalued" and was "a contributing factor" to the yawning US trade deficit with China -- the world's second biggest economy.

"People generally think that they are managing their currency in ways that make our goods more expensive to sell and their goods cheaper to sell here," he said.

China pledged in June to loosen its grip on the yuan, which had been effectively pegged at about 6.8 to the dollar since mid-2008. Since then, the currency has gained less than two percent against the greenback.

The central bank on Thursday set the central parity rate -- the middle of the allowed trading band for the currency -- at 6.7011 to the dollar. The yuan can move up or down 0.5 percent from that rate during the trading day.

That was weaker than the 6.6936 rate set Wednesday, which was the strongest against the greenback since June's pledge.

Last week, before meeting Obama, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao rejected a drastic appreciation of the yuan, warning that it would cause Chinese companies to go bankrupt and workers to lose their jobs.

Ahead of the House vote, China's central bank issued a statement pledging to increase the flexibility of the yuan and "gradually improve the exchange rate setting mechanism" -- near-identical to the wording it used in June.

A group representing US businesses in China criticized the bill, saying it puts thousands of American jobs in export-related industries at risk and would not spur growth in the world's biggest economy.

"Blaming China won't help the US economy but this legislation may cost American jobs," John Watkins, chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, said in a statement.

"We call on the US Senate to thoroughly review the proposed legislation and we hope it does not move forward in the legislative process."

Related Articles

Monday, November 15, 2010

Europe claims victory in Boeing subsidy row

GENEVA - European leaders have claimed victory after the World Trade Organization was said to have judged massive US subsidies to Boeing illegal.

The report, which has not been published, reportedly stated that billions of dollars in US aid to the aircraft manufacturer were illegal, prompting officials from the European Union, France and Boeing's arch-rival Airbus to claim victory.

"Boeing benefits from billions of dollars in government subsidies that have been judged illegal by the WTO," said Airbus spokesman Rainer Ohler.

European Union trade commissioner Karel De Gucht said the WTO findings "support the EU's view" of the decade-long dispute.

The complaint was brought to the WTO by the European Union, part of a long-running transatlantic spat over subsidies to the aerospace sector.

It came a year after the WTO rapped the EU for illegally providing subsidies to Airbus, a unit of the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company.

Under WTO rules, the interim ruling is meant to be held confidential until the global trade body publishes the full report by its panel of dispute settlement arbitrators.

But both sides were keen to spin their version of events as details poured into the public domain.

In a statement, Boeing said the WTO had issued a "massive rejection" of European claims that it received tens-of-billions of dollars in illegal subsidies.

"Nothing in today's public reports on the European case against the US even begins to compare to the 20 billion dollars in illegal subsidies that the WTO found last June that Airbus/EADS has received," Boeing said.

The EU had claimed Boeing received about US$23 billion of subsidies masked as defense research.

But there was some hope that the ruling could pave the way for a deal to end the often bitter dispute over aid.

Airbus called on its US rival to end the row and negotiate new funding rules for the aerospace industry.

"Now that both reports are available, it's time to stop blaming each other and to start assuming our responsibilities," said Airbus's Ohler.

"It's only when we stop these contentious suits and start negotiations that we'll be able to define new equitable rules of the game which will govern the future of the world's aerospace industry, a matter which is much more important than a transatlantic dispute," he added.

The EU likewise insisted that it is time to negotiate a settlement.

"Only negotiations at the highest political level can lead to a real solution," said European Union trade spokesman John Clancy reiterating the EU position that the new report "provides momentum in that direction."

Brussels brought its case to the WTO on October 6, 2004 -- the same day that Washington complained against EU subsidies to Airbus. It had therefore been frustrated by the time lag between the rulings on the two cases.

In Washington, US lawmakers aligned with either Airbus or Boeing voiced divergent views.

US Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama, a state where the European firm Airbus manufactures, noted that a WTO preliminary confidential report "confirmed that Boeing has in fact received subsides for aircraft development."

"Today's preliminary ruling clearly states that Boeing was involved in practices prohibited by the World Trade Organization," said Shelby, seen as an ally of Airbus parent EADS.

"While the confidential nature of this report will allow Boeing supporters to attempt to spin the facts in the media, it is clear that they can no longer rationally claim that this trade dispute is one sided."

But Representative Todd Tiahrt and Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas said the cases of Boeing and Airbus are quite different.

"None of the alleged subsidies to Boeing have anywhere near the market distorting effects of the launch aid the EU provided to Airbus," the two lawmakers said.

"The alleged US subsidies of standard economic development tools pale in comparison to the systematic EU strategy to take over the aviation industry."

Related Articles